Suggested projects rating scale

Points range	Verbal characteristics
1 -10	The project is presented in such a way that it is impossible to understand what is offered in it.

11-20	Unsystemized, inconsistent, contradictory presentation of the project, absence of task-oriented idea. Absence of any rational description of the project.

21 -30	The project is presented superficially. No additional information, on the base of which expert opinion could be made. Presented in such a way the project cannot get positive evaluation.

31-40	What is suggested is obsolete. It's been used worldwide for many years.

41 -50	What is suggested already exists as operating systems. Nothing brand new is offered. That is why the project is of no interest. Nevertheless, if authors find "zest" in it (in the subject field of the project new ideas, solutions, approaches can be found) then the project will be of interest.

51-60	What is suggested already exists. However, as good software is developed, on the base of which innovative project must be implemented, it is necessary to define clearly its fundamental innovative peculiarities as compared to existing commercial products.

61 -70	Is unique and of current interest. Contains novelty elements. It may deserve incentive prize.

71 -80	Is unique and of current interest. There is a need in results of the project for society. It must have serious practical importance. There is a trial model. However, further exploratory design is needed for improving design solutions. Without doubt it deserves incentive prize.

81 - 100	The project deserves the highest evaluation.